Hi Westie
I was dx in Nov last year, I had 3 cm lump, stage 3, right mastectomy and full node clearance, 5/11 nodes affected, her2 +++ - my chemo regime was 4 x fec/ 4 x tax with 20 rads in the middle.
I haven’t posted for a while, but you may remember my posts about the affect of tax. I had ‘sailed’ through the first 4 fec - well, as well as you can, nothing serious apart from a bit of heartburn and constipation - then had my 20 rads, then started on the tax. I have to say you have done far better than I did - I only managed one!!
After the first tax, I had every side effect you could name - I couldn’t walk because of the pain in my feet (eventually my skin literally peeled off both feet, all in one go - massive foot shaped piece of skin came off yukkkkk), I kept dropping things because of peripheral neuropathy in my hands, I was admitted to hospital with neutropenic sepsis and had to have IV antibiotics for 5 days, my finger nails and toe nails broke and fell off ( and I’m now almost 4 months from that ONE tax and they are still not recovered!!) - following this my onc took the decision that the tax should be discontinued - I was gutted at the time, as I felt that Tax was the ‘gold standard’ and that I had failed somehow. I was offered a further 2 x fec instead of the 3 x tax I was due ( could only have 6 x fec in total) - and I was devastated and felt like I was losing out somewhere. Onc assured me this wasn’t the case, and that in my particular area, they had had a large number of women for whom the side effects of tax were so dramatic they outweighed the benefits of continuing treatment.
As I’m a stats person - I had a look at the difference this would make on Adj online and while there was a difference, it wasn’t significant.
I couldn’t have carried on at all - I was a physical and emotional wreck by wk 2 following the first tax.
You have done more than enough having 4 x fec and 3 x tax - whilst I can understand where your OH is coming from (in terms of you getting the best possible treatment for your dx) I think he also has to understand the effects that having that last one would have on you. It really is a case of weighing up the pro’s & cons.
I am currently in a similar situation with Herceptin (but almost in reverse) - I have a very low heart rate, and was advised that I would probably only get the first 2 herceptins and no more because of heart readings, I was given the choice of whether I wanted to even start. I have a bad prognosis in terms of the cancer returning elsewhere, and Onc’s advice was that the risk of heart failure was far outweighed by the benfits of treatment - so I went with it.
Have just had my first heart scan and my reading has gone up! SO here’s to the next 4 treatments…!
Just don’t beat yourself up about your decision…if there’s one thing I’ve learnt along the way, it’s that you have to do what’s right for you…and the only person who really knows what that is - is you!
Margaret x