UK based, if its relevant.
Before I see the consultant againN your thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated.
Medical details:
2 malignant lesions (lesion 1 measured 24 mm on mammography and 12 mm on ultrasound;
lesion 2, measured 11 mm on mammography and 10 mm on ultrasound scan - lesions
were separated by a distance of 6 mm.)
An ultrasound scan of the right armpit identified 4 or 5
abnormal lymph nodes.
Biopsy from the right lymph node
identified a grade 2, invasive ductal cancer, hormone receptor positive (ER8, PR8) and HER2
low, Ki-67 60%.
Core biopsy of lesion 1 in the right breast was a grade 2, invasive ductal
cancer associated with intermediate grade DCIS, no lymphovascular invasion, hormone
receptor positive (ER 8, PR 8) and HER2 negative, Ki-67 40%.
Lesion 2 was a grade 2,
invasive ductal cancer associated with intermediate grade DCIS, no lymphovascular invasion,
hormone receptor positive (ER8, PR8) and HER2 low.
PET CT scan did not show any distant metastatic disease.
Oncotype DX score was 9.
** I was recommended to have a lumpectomy and full lymph node removal, which I had on Wednesday.
I’ve been told treatment will likely be radiotherapy and hormone therapy (rather than chemotherapy) because of the low oncotype score.
BUT…reading more, it seems chemotherapy is normally standard where more than three lymph nodes are involved (and that the oncotype score becomes irrelevant at 3+ lymph nodes).
Any thoughts on this as to why chemotherapy isn’t being suggested? Or whether it should be?
I guess my concerns are that, although nothing was found on the PET CT scan, chemotherapy might be a more definite way to prevent future recurrence or get rid of anything that may already be lurking in wait! **
Thanks for any help, advice, thoughts or guidance!