Hello sceptics everywhere… I’ve had 11 years living with this disease and its progression to work out where I stand and who I believe and what I want to do about it - for myself - it’s up to you who you want to believe and if you want to do anything about it.
I have a sneaking suspicion that anyone who is reading this thread has an open mind and is curious about what s/he can do about supporting her/his treatment and fighting strongly for life, otherwise, why read it…?
The people out there - doctors and scientists, who contribute to the websites and research papers I suggest are worth reading, of course have 20:20 vision - that is HIND-SIGHT! and are passing on the lessons learned, NOT to make money, but to perhaps reduce the incidence of future cancers and to perhaps reduce the velocity of the cancers we all unfortunately have now. For every 1 diet that is recommended by 20-50 years of research there are probably scores which come out of the imagination of food gurus pushing supplements and seaweeds and much wierder things too, which are as much junk food as the gooh-filled fast foods served in mega-portions in fastfood outlets coast to coast in USA, not to mention the websites of the dairy promotion, meat promotion, sugar promotion and alcohol promotion and drug promotion companies and cartels. I’ve been to the US and gone to fast food outlets and seen how many customers need 2 chairs to sit on - one for each cheek… I’ve lived a normal post-war London lifestyle, drunk the milk, eaten the butter, cream, yogurts and cheese, enjoyed the steak, the sweets, the crisps, the convenience foods, the wine and taken the prescription drugs like a good girl.
However… There seems to be a growing consensus, based on decades of evidence based scientific analysis, about a cancer-hostile diet and now I want some of that!
It is largely (preferably wholly) plant-based and very low fat, virtually (preferably wholly) alcohol free and organic is best. It can do me no harm.
Knowing it prevents disease and can help to put it in check doesn’t mean anyone’s going to follow it!
Also it needs to be backed up by regular exercise and some stress reduction lifestyle changes.
What’s behind this? A growing knowledge of how growth factors and sex hormones and stress hormones and free radicals and endocrine disrupting chemicals (like the pesticides with which most foods are treated), iniciate and promote cell damage, cancer cell growth, and proliferation and that there is a link between our environment: externallly the world around us and how we interact with it and internally, what we put in our bodies. (food, drink and pollutants).
Back in 1958 came the first hint that smoking damages health. How many of you are still waiting for absolute proof and a guarantee that you’re going to die of smoking related coronary heart disease or cancer of the bladder, kidneys, breast or lungs before you give up smoking? I’m sorry if that sounds harsh to smokers out there - personally I don’t mean to be. I’m just making a point that it’s 51 years ago now that the link between smoking and health was made. Around 30 of those years the tobacco farmers and cigarette makers were successfully in silencing all opposition in the western world while they made their money out of us. It’s only this last year that our governments have had the guts to stand up for health and taken the risk of falling tax revenues from cigarettes and the ban in public places is already saving lives. But the tobacco companies are still at it - despite everything we all know (including the World Health Organisation). Only they’re selling smoking as an attractive western lifestyle choice to the masses in China, India, S. America and Africa and their largely non-smoking shareholders don’t care where the profit comes from.
Billions of dollars were paid to US senators and congressmen to get them to vote in favour of the tobacco lobby. This last 30 years, the big food companies’ and durg companies’ have joined in funding the gravy train.
But if even the cancer sufferers and heart attack patients and diabetics don’t turn to a healthier diet and lifestyle when given the information, knowledge and power to do so, they don’t have much to worry about. There’ll be a market for their obesity- driving, cancer causing, diabetic generating, cardiac arresting foods, drinks and life-threatening drugs for decades to come.
Don’t feel guilty about you choices - if you are in the majority. In a democracy, I think that means their shareholdes get your vote and their profit. What makes me sick is the exploitation of the medical profession by drug peddlers and the companies who peddle their nutrition-free, chemical-rich foods to the smallest children and the medical schools and education and children’s health advocates stand by and watch.
I hear what others are saying about their healthy diets and lifestyles that have got them into their 60’s, 70’s and 80’s before they got cancer.My Mum was 83 when she had her mastectomy. Even at that age, she looked around to see if there were changes she could make to help her get over it and is now, still healthily, a few weeks short of 91. She did take tamoxifen and then arimidex. Now she takes neither. If there’s evidence something will help her, she will ask for it or do it herself. She still enjoys a glass of red wine every day - as she has done for the last 30 years - before that it was a few glasses every now and then. She’s given up dairy products and meat and still enjoys some fish and dairy-free chocolate. She’s not surprised she has arthritis and had knee and hip replacements in her 70’s because she was overweight all her adult life. Honestly why do I think she had cancer? I think it was the stress and shock of my Dad dying and me (her youngest) getting breast cancer 2 years later that triggered it. Hers followed 2 years after.
You see, I believe there has to be a trigger. Hers was bereavement and fear of losing me.
(my brother’s daughter died of cancer aged 17 btw, who was a healthy weight all her life, physically active, ate well, etc. and maybe had some genetic defect as it was one of the juvenile cancers, so I understand the argument that not all cancers can be prevented).
But if the scene isn’t set for the cells to respond to the trigger, in other words, if something hasn’t initiated cancer in our bodies that can BE triggered, then it ain’t going to happen and that’s a combination between the susceptibility for the disease and some lifelong exposure or even one-time only exposure to risk which has built up to a critical level, ripe for development.
It is pointless beating ourselves up about how we got to here!!! Really, it doesn’t matter. My oncoloist tried to get me angry 4 years ago when I had my first recurrence because I hadn’t had chemo after the first surgery. I told him it was unimportant - what was important was what he recommended to treat the recurrence. He still mentioned it at the next 3 appointments. Each time I refused to take the bait and get wound up. How I ended up sitting my side of his desk was irrelevant to where we went from ther.
So what matters is what we do each day from now on. If we can tend to look after ourselves better, get more fresh air, exercise, eat well, (only put nutritious food in our mouths and not empty calories or harmful chemicals or hormone and grow factor laden foods), we might even improve our wellbeing - cancer or no cancer. And if not, well, we have free will and live in a democracy where the illusion of free choice still prevails. Whatever we each choose is is just that - personal choice. Once you have the information, you have the choice to take it or leave it. And each new day you have a new choice.
So I’ve had cancer for 11 years. I lived a fairly healthy existence but have managed to become suceptible and the disease was triggered and has progressed. I think I would have got it younger and not enjoyed such wellbeing as I do now, had I not done what I could to find out what to do for the best and acted on some of it. This has changed over the years as more has become known or been released into the public domain. And I act on what I’ve learned, mostly… With hindsight, once I’d got the diagnosis 11 years ago (and I’m not going further back than that…), there are some things I’d have done differently, but I’m here now and looking forward. I’m sure you are too.
Wishing you well,
Jenny