76K members
1.2M posts
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Guest user
Not applicable

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

I think we are in this together too. I shouldnt bother posting all you get is attacked for having a point of view.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Thanks for the link, Linda. That confirms what I was told by the Blood Service; that people who've been diagnosed with the vast majority of cancers can't give blood because of the increased risk of there being cancer cells present, compared to the rest of the population, not because of any treatment effects.

This is a very good point and, together with the issue of insurance, again points to the fact that there is no such thing as "cured", until you die of something else.

A number of people have stated that secondary BC isn't a death sentence. Unfortunately, it is just that - our BC will kill us and, in most cases, it will be severely life-limiting. However, Chocciemuffin has it right when she says that it will not necessarily be an immediate death sentence. In the meantime, every scan and every time a treatment fails, it's torture. Yes, we all live with the fear, whatever our stage, but the fear has become a reality at Stage IV.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

hello everyone - as Choicem says this is a great thread and i really appreciate all the thoughts and comments - as ever Choicem you sum it all up beautifully and i thoroughly support your thanks to our secondary friends. My non cancer friends simply do not get it at all, the sword of damacles thing- i hit a bit of a low with it recently - you may have seen my post about all my mates laughing and joking about cleveages for ages one drunken friday night - it caused a spiral of new fear and anxiety that i thought was long gone (DX feb2010) ...but then i read about you secondary lasses and your challenges and pills and fears and i feel inspired again i really do - same as when i was on FEC-T - its the we can do it together thing.
thought of my friend helen again today who died in september - and now i can think of her in a good way, all her achievements and successes - anyone interested in interior design check her out - helen green design - its stunning stuff.
warm wishes to you all from sunny newcastle, N

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

I was pondering the blood donation issue with cancer patients, and CRUK has this to say .
http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-help/about-cancer/cancer-questions/can-i-donate-blood-if-i-have-had-cancer

Also, i was wondering IF people can be considered cured after treatment for BC ,why we are discrimanated against Life Insurence? I know there are lots of other illnesses that can be considered cured and come back like Lulu quite rightly says , includeing Chicken pox for instance, but i doubt if Chicken pox would struggle to get insurences.
In any event, dont scientists inject mice/rats with cancer cells in order for them to grow tumours? to be able to do research and test out new treatments?.
I have often thought about the number of people who may have cancer unbenown to them and are donateing blood , maybe this is one of the reasons that blood transfusions are not given so freely these days as it is known that blood transfusions can cause its own risks too.
Linda x

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

What an interesting thread, which I've read from the beginning. Just joining in to send my best wishes to all secondary ladies, both those whose treatment is keeping things under control (note, not "cured") and for those who are having a particularly hard time of things at the moment.

When I was asked on a radio show, "so you're cured now?" I just replied "no, there's no such thing. The best they can say is there is no evidence of disease. And I hope it stays that way for a long time." So far so good, but that sword of Damocles is still there. Yeah, it's probably there for every human being (as everyone dies of something eventually) but could it be that with a cancer diagnosis we are made more aware of it because our own particular sword has a very clear identity?

I know you secondary ladies don't feel particularly brave/strong/inspirational, but you have definitely helped us primary ladies, both in dealing with our own diagnosis and in understanding that even if we are unlucky enough to get a secondary diagnosis it's not NECESSARILY going to be a "dead in a couple of weeks" kind of thing (I must admit, when first diagnosed I had that one hit me in the face, before I had learnt anything about BC).

For that, and the support you continue to give, I thank you.

Guest user
Not applicable

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Hi Ladies,
Wow some very strong feelings but very much like what gordok1 has said and like the way she says the real world isn't that clear cut I am just begining to see that for myself and feel very scared of a recurrance but am struggling through my daily life right now coming to terms with my first DX and being only 1 week out of all my treatments (other than tabs) am hoping that my fear of it coming back won't stop me from moving forward in a positive manner without letting that fear rule my life once I have got to grips with the loss of my oestrogen gordok1 has given me hope that this is possible I also wish Bernie the best of luck and it's easy to put on a public face and let people believe your coping very well but am sure when in private that story is very different.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Dib, I totally agree. I think we're all in this together. It doesn't matter if you have a primary diagnosis or a secondary diagnosis, we all have the sword of damocles hanging over our heads. I think talk of cures, beating breast cancer etc, shows a total misunderstanding of the complexity of the situation, and skirts over what having cancer actually involves (in particular it's emotional impact).

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Mrs Blue, I think maybe you have misunderstood Alloways point. Alloway was just saying that some doctors use words like cure, all clear etc, when they know that is not the case - and that is evidenced by the fact that they do not allow those who have been diagnosed with cancer to be blood or organ donors.
I agree it would be fool hardy to allow cancer patients to be donors. I read recently about someone in the US who developed breast cancer after receiving an organ from a dead patient who had breast cancer 12 years previously, but died of something else (apparently in the US, if someone has not had a recurrence in a certain amount of time they can be donors). They were able to prove that the BC arose from the infected organ. Desperately sad situation, and just goes to prove that cancer can hang about undetected for years.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

I have secondary bc in my liver and bones - so I have cancer cells in my blood, despite being on treatment.
It makes sense that I cannot donate my blood.
Alloway, does this make sense to you?

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Alloway and mrs blue

i dont think its the cancer that stops you from donating but the treatment.... Anybody giving blood who hasnt been diagnosed still might have cancer.... Its a UK thing... In the US you can donate a certain length of time after treatment.... But in the UK its never again Unless you had skin cancer or cervical cancer which were completely 'cured'.... So im presuming that folks with mets in the US cant give as they are usually still having treatment but this is more to protect the donor (If your anaemic from chemo taking more blood off you isnt a very good idea) than to protect the recipient as theres no evidence that you can 'catch' cancer.

in Amercas sue anything that moves culture if it really wasnt safe they would be the first ones not to do it.... Think the UK is just continuing to nanny us.

Alloway and just to be pedantic back.... Lots of diseases you are cured from have a potential to come back.... Chicken pox.... but like i said just being pedantic really.

I think that some comments are very hurtful verging on aggressive on this post and although some with LOUD voices seem not to be very tactful or maybe just dont have a good way of coming over. for many who have primary BC their biggest fear is getting cancer again... Whether it be another primary, recurrence or mets... But mets is the scariest place but hopefully this discussion will show some of the primary peeps that its perhaps not quite as scary as they origianlly imagined.... but fear does make people say and do things that they may not normally do.

lemongrove i liked your descriptions and tbh if somebody asks me i just say no cancer at the mo. But i do know that some people even with a few ladies with secondaries want to cling to the hope that they will be cured.

there is so much about curable, treatable, remission, incurable, untreatable, etc,.... The world would be so much better if we could just have preventable instead.... Who knows... Maybe one day! But in the meantime we are all living with cancer or the threat of it so lets stick together.... One BIG voice shouts so much louder.... Than lots of little not picky ones.

Val what you said about how your words were changed i had that experience too last year... I was interviews for a newspaper about having BRCA 2 and they asked about me having mastectomies and i said i hadnt decided yet as it maybe a bit pointless having Had BC three times its possible its already spread so For me it might be too late... But the reporter wrote some people will have mastectomies but for me there was little point as it was already too late... I was really worried my family would be freaked out that i was keeping something from them.

another incident this week speaking to a guy on the end of the phone about insurance and he did this medical thingy and ask was cancer still confined to breast so i said no, he said to nodes under arm, i said no, he said to where i said to nodes in chest wall.... He also asked about other medical problems and we will cover your high cholesterol but not you breast cancer or your metastatic breast cancer.... Now i know that medics refer to any cancer that has gone anywhere out of breast even to lymph nodes is termed as metastatic but most people dont.... I think there is faults all round with the language used. I complained to the guy as i hadnt mentioned the word mets to him, but did worry me that somebody with primary bc would be told they werent covered for their metastatic BC.... Admittedly mine is stage 3 but it coud be really shocking to hear that from your insurance salesman and not your surgeon.

Not sure if that makes much sense.... Cant sleep as worrying about my wee friend with brain mets who isnt doing very well. Prayers for Kazza.
love and best wishes to you all.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

"Ok - to all the medics who talk of "cures" and "curable" - why can't we ever donate blood again?"
Good point, Alloway! I was a blood donor long ago - got the bronze badge!
I think that even with secondary cancer, we can donate our corneas, but this probably needs checking out.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

some of us `primaries` have lived through and nursed loved ones diagnosed with secondaries.I dont pretend to know what its like to be diagnosed but I have lived with the devastation that the diagnosis has caused and as stated in an earlier post,I take comfort from the knowledge that a secondary diagnosis doesnt automatically mean a death sentence and that comfort has come from these secondary threads and the inspiration that many of you ladies give to the primary bc ladies.I dont think any thread should be solely for a certain section of bc ladies but I do think that maybe some people should think very carefully before they submit their post.
Di.x

Guest user
Not applicable

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Wow, I've just read this whole discussion and I really can't believe that anyone without secondaries really thinks they can really make valid comments on secondary diagnosis. Before I had my secondary dx I would never ever have the arrogance to think I understood one tiny thing of what it is like to dx with secondaries. I totally back Lemongrove all the way onthis'sdiscussion, and all ladies agreeing with her. Where is the moderator.........? This is a secondaries forum...aa safe place for us! Xx

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Ok - to all the medics who talk of "cures" and "curable" - why can't we ever donate blood again? Surely, if we're cured ours should be as good as anyones!
Just to be pedantic, how can you possibly be cured of a disease that has the potential to come back?

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

"NED" is standard terminology these days and is used by many health professionals, or perhaps it's just by the more enlightened ones who are up-to-date with current thinking.

Unfortunately, though, there are still those who will tell patients they are "all clear", when what they really mean is that the patients' scans and/or other results are currently all clear. And unfortunately, that doesn't take into account what might be happening at a cellular level, but which can't yet be picked up by current testing methods.

Similarly, and incredibly, there are even some health professionals who still believe that younger people can't get BC and refuse them scans, biopsies, etc. on that basis. My point here being that health professionals are not infallible and can get it very wrong, too.



Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Thinking back I was told my tumour was 'potentially' curable....am stage 1 grade3 Her2+ and ER+ and I did believe that at the time. Now I am not so sure and certainly do not live complacently.
Lemongrove I think your terminology is spot on for both primary and seconday diagnosis. X

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

I don't think it is only the media either. My onc, my surgeon and my Macmillan nurse all told me when I was first diagnosed (grade 3 two 5cm tumours, triple negative, no node involvement) that the treatment, if successful, would cure me. I'm pretty sure I remember them saying that and it's not just because that's what I wanted to hear. So the medical profession too has some responsibility for this. Now when friends and family say that that is it and I'm now fine and cancer clear, however, I always respond with a vague - 'yes - for now things are OK' because that's how I feel. I sometimes feel that this irritates them a little but tough. I will never feel confident or complacent again. I, like most people when they were diagnosed, felt absolutely fine apart from the lump. It means that I will never again trust my body's ability to function properly. That's the legacy for me anyhow. When I hear people on telly saying that they've got the all clear - I just do my deep breathing exercises until the sick feeling in the pit of my stomach subsides! hugs to all. Jan x

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

I have read this thread with interest ,my surgeon said in the letter sent with the pathology results from my surgery
" It is never possible to say that you are "cured" of breast cancer"
Jill xxxx

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Saffronseed, if doctors do tell patients they are cancer free, they shouldn't because the patient may well have remaining cells which are undetectable. The best any doctor can say is that there is currently no evidence of disease. As for Bernie, she did say on the Graham Norton Radio show , that she was completely free of cancer - and that may have created a misleading view of and played down the seriousness of cancer. What she should have said in my view, is that there is currently no evidence of disease, (and hopefully it won't come back - although it could).
This is just my view, and you are perfectly entitled to disagree, but I think it is important that we do not collude in the deception. The media are always looking to entertain, and we shouldn't allow something as serious as BC to be used for that purpose.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Doctors do tell you that you are 'cancer free' after you have had a mastectomy as they have cut it all away and if at that moment in time your CT scans are clear. My view is that there is nothing wrong in being told that- it does give you a boost and hope for the future. They always (in my experience anyhow) also add that it may return and that is why you have the 6 monthly check ups and a 'hot line' to them if you experience any pain/changes or worries. What they don't say is that it will never 'come back' I understand that and we all have different coping mechanisms for dealing with this uncertainty. So Bernie if Bernie did say she was 'cancer free' she was probably reporting what she had been told and what she understood from her medics to be right at that time. We all know how unpredicatable this nasy disease I would never say I am cured - I don't even say NED - I tend to stick to 'I am being treated for breast cancer'.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Sika, I do believe some doctors need to be careful about the language they use. I think when they are dealing with someone with an early stage cancer, they shouldn't say they can offer a cure, because that provides legitimacy for innacurate information, which then tends to get bandied about. Also, it could undermine trust and confidence if the patient later suffers a recurrence. I also think it is wrong when those diagnosed with secondary cancer are told there is now no cure - because the fact is, there never was a cure. My feeling is that anyone who has been diagnosed with BC is in the same boat really, in that none of us know for sure how our cancer will behave, and as such, have the sword of damocles hanging over our head. Fortunately most of those diagnosed with a stage 1 cancer will survive, but that cannot be guaranteed. Consequently ,I would prefer it if, when dealing with someone with a stage 1 primary cancer, doctors said something like, 'your cancer is confined to the breast, and by removing it we believe we can contain it - in which case the prognosis is very good, and with treatment the statistics suggest your cancer is unlikely to return'. Similarly when dealing with a person with secondary cancer, they shouldn't say your cancer is now no longer curable (because it never was), but say something like ' unfortunately your cancer has now spread to your system and is therefore no longer containable -but we have treatments which may slow progression, and in some cases halt progression.
Truth is the key.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Perhaps the medical profession play a part in this. My surgeon said that my cancer is curable but that if it spreads (or already has) it would be 'not curable but treatable'. I wouldn't have seen the problem with using the language the surgeon used with me. (as i have come to understand more about BC and my risk of recurrence and spread, I will never describe myself as cured though, and I can't imagine ever feeling 'free from cancer' - but that is personal choice that may be at odds with what my surgeon would say)

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Lemongrove - I so agree with you.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Safronseed, On This Morning (28th October 2010), Bernie stated that she was “cancer free” after undergoing a mastectomy, chemotherapy, and taking Herceptin. Also, on the Graham Norton Radio Show (3rd February 2012), Bernie announced that she was “completely free of cancer”.
Nobody wants to rub salt in the wound because the poor lady has enough to contend with. I just feel the way she depicted her original diagnosis, was wrong, and perpetuated the simplification and trivialisation of a complex and serious disease.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Foxyferret, just because cancer can progress very rapidly doesn't mean it will. The point I was making was that the media should not portray people with primary BC as being cured or of winning the battle etc, and neither should they describe those with secondary BC as having lost the battle, or as having no hope - it's just not that simple. People with primary cancer live each day with uncertainty the same as those who have secondary cancer. Of course, most people with stage 1 BC survive, but that is not always the case, and sometimes there are people with secondary cancer who live for years and outlive those who were initially diagnosed with primary cancer.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

I am not getting into this arguement but would like to reply to Lemongrove. I do read the secondary threads ( I am a primary lady) and take much encouragement from them. I realise my cancer may come back, I believe it probably will, but as Grade 1 Stage 1 I thought I would have a few years yet. Your comment about a seemingly innocent primary can have cancer sweep through through their body in four months worried me .
Have you stats for this? I do realise that you have a lot of knowledge on this blasted disease that I don't. I am 9 months on from diagnosis and so far so good. One day who knows....?

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Key features, Perhaps I can direct you more explicitly, then, to: "Let's face it, everyone with or without cancer has a terminal diagnosis...unless you believe in resurrection."

If that doesn't trivialise a secondaries diagnosis, then I don't know what does. You are, by now, aware that you have posted this crass statement on a board for people with secondaries, whose aim is to find information and support.

If you cannot understand that it is insensitive and offensive to express this sentiment here, then I feel it probably is best for you to "bow out" of this particular discussion.

As for the rest of your post, it only continues to offend; the mere suggestion that anyone with secondaries would want another living being to go through what s/he has to endure just illustrates how little you've taken on board from the whole of this thread.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

No one on earth would wish you ill, Keyfeatures. Perhaps it is your style of writing that can come across as being rather blunt. This is the trouble when we are all 'strangers'. I found some of your posts insensitive, it's true but I would hate that to be translated as wishing someone bad luck or ill health. We probably need to learn to agree to disagree on some points of view. I very much hope that your treatment goes well and that your life will be long and happy. The BC experience is not easy for any of us and that is probably why our emotions are high when we think (and I stress 'think') our conditions are being trivialised. Good luck.

Guest user
Not applicable

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

I'm 40. I have a diagnosis of cancer. I'm in the middle of chemo. I feel as if I'll be lucky to make it to 60. How is expressing this insensitive and offensive?! Yes, I am at a different stage of my cancer journey, but that's hardly my fault. Anyway, I'm certainly not feeling like people are wishing me well - it almost feels as if some would like me to get secondaries to know what it feels like. I'll know where to come for a "told you so". It's clear I'm not welcome. So I'll bow out.
I wish eveyone all the best with their ongoing treatment and Angelfalls I hope you get some more positive results from your future chemo.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Thank you, Tawny. Take care. xx

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Angelfalls, perfectly put. Thank you. I hope you get some more heartening news come January. x

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Key features wrote: "Let's face it, everyone with or without cancer has a terminal diagnosis...unless you believe in resurrection. Average life expectancy is 78 for men and 82 for women. Personally, at this rate I'll be happy to make it into my 60s."

Key features, this is the most insensitive and frankly offensive post you've come up with yet!

I am 41 years old and have been in treatment for BC constantly and with no break since I was 31. Although I currently have no known organ involvement, I have tumours behind my sternum, my whole breastbone is "moth-eaten" and I have node involvement right up to my neck. The last 2 chemos (over the last 8 months), have not worked and my tumours are currently growing at the rate of around 1cm per month. I won't find out if my current treatment is working or not until January. The chances of me making it into my 60s are extremely slim. This is a relatively positive experience of secondary breast cancer and I regard myself as one of the "lucky" ones.

Your views are crude, rude and your tone is flippant and arrogant. I really hope that one day, you won't have to eat your words. In the meantime, please try to have a little more humanity for those of us who are suffering physically and/or emotionally as a result of our diagnosis and prognosis. Please try to understand that many of the views that you disagree with are based on a great deal more experience of this situation than you may ever have and, as such, should be respected, regardless of whether you agree with them or are able to understand them or not.

Tawny, I really hope you won't be chased off a thread that you've found useful and interesting by a small number of ignorant and insensitive posters.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

http://www.itv.com/presscentre/pressreleases/programmepressreleases/bernienolanongmtv/default.html

i have posted a link as to when Bernie was on the this morning programme and the interview she gave then - it seems quite sensible and balanced I think. The only mention I can find about a 'year out of my life' is when in one interview she mentions being down is from the mirror newspaper and getting an email from someone who was 10 years down the line and this person had said ' its only a year out of your life' its not something Bernie said. The headlines about being 'cured' are clearly newstories I can't find any thing where Bernie has said that herself. The press/newspapers seem to want to cling onto the positive stories and unfortunately for celebs they are often misquoted or misrepresented too.
MIRROR QUOTE 'There was one particular email that came when we were a bit down. This woman had had the same cancer as me 10 years ago and said, You can get over it. Its one year of your life and it will go by really quickly.'


XX

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Quail I understand that people use denial as a coping mechanism, but with affection and respect, I think we have to ask why they need to do this (and in my humble view, the reasons are more complex than being just part of the human condition) . A couple of peope have made the point that BC is actually very high profile, and not marginalised at all (and of course all the pink fluffy stuff is very high profile), but the trouble is this approach doesn't address the realities of BC, it trivialises it, and fosters ignorance when we need to raise awareness.
Maybe in our modern society we expect answers/cures, and because the cure for BC (and other cancers), remain ellusive, BC is a bogey-man of diseases. But like all bogey-men, once confronted they lose their impact. It seems to me (and maybe as a secondary person my view is slightly skewed), that the media sway from one extreme to the other. They either portray BC as curable, and describe people winning the battle etc, or else portray those with secondary BC as people who didn't win the battle after all, and are now trying to resist the inevitable (which will probably be a nasty and sticky death). The truth is that nobody (whether they have a primary or secondary diagnosis) can say they are cured, or have won the battle, and neither are those with secondary cancer people who didn't win the battle. All of us with BC are in the same boat, in that we have to deal with a great uncertainty. Someone with a seemingly innocent primary can have cancer sweep through their body in four months (and there is nothing they or their medical team can do about it, because some cancers do not respond to treatment), while. conversely, people with secondary BC, can and do live relatively normal lives for many years (and do not have nasty deaths, as most are heavily sedated). The high profile pink stuff is OK to raise funds, but there needs to be some education about what BC actually means.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

I do know what you are saying, Lemon Grove. I am working hard to convince my family that I am NOT cured, and it is NOT over, even if for the time being I am not diagnosed with secondaries. BUT (you knew that was coming, didn't you?) I think it may be part of the human condition for us and/or our loved ones to try to deny our mortality, even up to the point of death in some instances. My friend who is suffering from MS tells me that her family constantly dismiss her symptoms and try to play them down, even though she can see that she is worsening before their eyes, and actually really needs emotionally for them to honour her illness rather than dismiss it. When my mother was diagnosed with stage four lung cancer four years ago, her slightly deaf husband mis-heard the doctor, and thought that she could (and would) be cured, and they spent most of the next year in that completely ridiculous (to her daughters) place, even though we kept trying to get them to understand and cope with the reality. Same with my sister's husband's pancreatic cancer, also stage four. They were going to "beat this thing". Or not, as the case was.
I know that breast cancer IS different. Because nowadays so many women do continue to live long lives with BC, it is easier for the fiction of immortality to be cast over the illness. I think that leukemia and lymphoma are a bit the same; there are so many people who recover or go into remission that it is assumed that if you get it, no big deal. But it is a big deal, men and women still die of breast cancer in far too great a number for any complacency. I have always been impressed that Jenni Murray usually mentions the women who haven't been as lucky as she has been when she talks about her cancer.
Part of the reason that it is important for us to make the story clear, is that there is so much more work that needs to be done, and it'll be expensive. Like the cyberknife (I'll go over and bump it, after this waffle). And I too find the words and stories of women with secondary breast cancer worth reading. I'm still scared of dying, and I'm still scared of developing secondaries, but you all have made my fears more bearable. Many of us primaries who have crashed this conversation (I blame this ridiculous forum, where you don't know what catagory you're crashing, all you see is the thread name--roll on Springtime and a new design) have learned a lot from your articulate arguments. One of the reasons it is helpful for me as a primary to read the seconday threads is that it gives me a language to use with friends and family. 'Last month Val wrote that...', 'Lemongrove says....', 'A woman I know with secondaries in her liver and bones says..', 'When Claire was dying she told us...'. It helps make it a reality, not just for me, but for my friends and family who need to understand. Thank you, and, when you can, keep writing (that includes you, Tawny, try not to let our insensitivity get you down--some of us are a bit bull-in-a-china-shopish, but we don't mean to be)

Guest user
Not applicable

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Excellent comment there LG. Sums it up for me perfectly!
Laurie x

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Jackster, to answer your question, I think that in the main I would like the media to stop using words like cured, beaten, won the battle, just a year out of my life etc, because the media are the opinion formers. I don't think the medical profession use words like cured, beaten, won the battle etc (most are far too litigation savvy to tell patients they are cured). As for patients, I appreciate that people have their own coping strategies. It would be good if they could confront their demons, but that often is not possible or takes time. What cancer patients shouldn't do in my opinion, is collude in the deception though, just to keep family/friends/colleagues happy. I can't think of any other potentially life threatening disease where people actually pretend that everything is hunky-dory, and wonder if that's because cancer is still taboo.
It's such a shame that the media seem to have this view that the reality is too negative to talk about, because if they opened up to the reality they would discover a whole range of experiences, and human emotions. Personally I find listening to the stories of strong women who know the score, faced up to it, and manage to enjoy life anyway, inspiring - and these messages may help the less strong to gain strength.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Tawny, please don't step away, say your piece. The whole point is that those of us with secondary BC need to let others know the reality, because for the most part the reality is not voiced, but is actually drowned out by the media. There will always be people who prefer to bury their heads in the sand, and talk clap trap about having won the battle etc, because I suspect, reducing the size of the monster helps them cope.
As I said earlier, nobody who has been diagnosed with BC (be they primary or secondary), can say they have beaten the disease, or are cured. The best anyone can say is that everything seems OK at the moment/or not as the case may be, and the media need to take that on board.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Yes, we all know we are going to die at some stage but that's an abstract notion. Being given a prognosis of 3 years makes things feel a hell of a lot different, I can assure you. I can't believe some of the statements that have been written here. So very insensitive. I'm absolutely fuming. We all have to deal with the hand we are given but when one is feeling poorly and looking for a bit of solidarity and support it is upsetting to read ill informed comments. I stepped away from this discussion due to an earlier post, but the poster explained that she had worded it badly and so I have been following the thread with interest. A lot of good things have been written but I will end on this note: I have tried my hardest to remain upbeat since diagnosis but have had a recent spread in my bones which has left me in a lot of pain and I'm frightened. I know what I'm facing. Please try and be sensitive when posting on a secondaries thread, unless you are dealing with the condition you have no idea. Be kind, re-read your posts and be considerate. Please.

Guest user
Not applicable

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

This Morning fashion feature in October this year used women with breast cancer to model the clothes. One of them was a secondaries lady who explained that her cancer was no longer curable, but could be treated. There were also a few people with secondaries on Stand Up to Cancer night and the Sing for your Life programme.

Even if you haven't had a BC diagnosis you might still have BC (most of us will have had it for a long time before it was diagnosed). Let's face it, everyone with or without cancer has a terminal diagnosis...unless you believe in resurrection. Average life expectancy is 78 for men and 82 for women. Personally, at this rate I'll be happy to make it into my 60s.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Hi Lemongrove,

Can I ask what your wish is? Do you want the media to stop using words like cured, beaten, survivied or is it also the medidical profession and people with breast cancer?

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Saffronseed, I think Bernie Nolan did go on TV didn't she? Seem to recall seeing her playing things down, on a programme called This Morning, when she had her primary diagnosis. While I have great sympathy for her recent diagnosis, I do think there is a symbiotic relationship between Celebrities and the media. Celebs want publicity and programmes like This Morning are looking for an upbeat interview.
Again there is nothing wrong with giving upbeat information, so long as it is factual. So words like cured, beaten, won the battle are completely inappropriate (as is describing treatment as just a year out of ones life). The fact is, all anyone with BC canreally say (be they primary or secondary), is that everything seems fine at the moment /or not, as the case may be.

Florie, there are one or two journalists who have been pushing for Cyberknife. When we launched our charity the UKCK Network at the House of Commons, one of those who spoke about CK's importance, was the ITN presenter Tom Bradby (because Tom's Mum had cancer, and his family had a awful struggle to get CK for her). We have also had a lot of support from a Telegraph journalist (again because of family circumstance).

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Well I'm dipping in again as I've been thinking a lot about what could possibly be done to improve matters and make people appreciate the reality whilst giving a ray of hope at the same time.

Linking in to both Bernie Nolan's secondary diagnosis (and I forgot to mention previously how sorry I am to hear her news) and about the negative reporting regarding breast cancer screening, I wonder if the press could be used to promote Lemongrove's efforts on the petition for the Cyberknife machines. Perhaps if people were given the facts about secondaries but told that cybersurgery machines had the potential to help those patients, then there may be a bit more support towards them. Also, if there are so many people being 'over treated' for primary cancers surely this would be good reason for more cybersurgery machines to be available across the country, on the NHS, to avoid some of the more drastic treatments?

Referring to what Keyfeatures said about making a complaint about the reporting, perhaps the press could redress the balance if they wrote about the Cyberknife petition and asked the general public for support. After all, the machines would benefit more than just breast cancer patients.


Val, I find your posts are very considered and you give out a real calming influence.

Best wishes to all.
X

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

scottishlass I agree entirely with you in respect of the Press - don't want to tar them all with the same brush but they do misinterpret what people say to make a story - and you were obviously a victim of it which is par for the course. In my job I have dealings with the press and we have to be very careful what we say and how we say it as they are always looking for a 'angle' to make the story more interesting or more fitting with their own values. I would say to everyone that it may look like celebs who have cancer are saying things like 'I am cured' or a 'year out of my life' but in fact they haven't said it at all in that context. Even televised interviews can be changed too if they are recorded - as they cut bits out and when they ask a question sometimes but a different clip as the answer (again this has happened to me in my job). The only way what you say cannot be changed to suit is if it is a live interview or TV programme.

Guest user
Not applicable

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

I like realistic too Lulu. I am not sure if this makes sense but if I know what might happen and know I can deal with it I feel less anxious. Plus doing what I want and can do. The articles that seem to reflect the reality of treatment and emotion have often been written by journalists that have experienced it so the work is more likely to be published as they meant it to be. Had not really thought of how a paper will change the meaning of words given in a spoken interview - that must have awful Val.

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Well I am pessimistic and optomistic all at different times. I have been having treatment over a long period of time (almost 24 years) and I can remember both diagnosis like it was yesterday. I have seen how things have changed over all this time in lots of different ways. So many more younger people in the ward having treatment. I was considered very young at the time I first found out I had BC, 39. There were generally older ladies having treatment back then. I came across BCC site quite by chance when I was looking for information. Having a great site like BCC helped me to discover that I am not the only person who has secondariy Breast cancer because I knew no one when I found out about my secondaries and there were no secondary support groups in my area. Also Maggie centres are a bonus to those abe to acess them.
Gettting back to the optomistic/pessimistic outlook. I think I go through BOTH over all this peiod of time. Like today I am going for MRI Scans. I know in my heart that something is not right but having been able to read/talk with ladies on here who have recently gone through similar tests helps me. Reading the press does NOT. I did an interview years ago with a local newspaper. They changeged my words completely to fit in with the article they were writing. My Mother who coud not talk to me about my BC ( I am an only child/old lady now!) and I look at photographs of her from that time and see the pain she suffered because she thought it should be her not me who had this horribe disease. But the paper upset her so much when she read it and I had to explain to her that it was not what I had said. I was so angry that I vowed never to buy the paper again. ( I have though!)
Celebrities and their press statements do not give me much hope because when any of them say they are cured it upsets me that others believe that this is so certain. It coud be so but it also may not be so and that is the hard part of the whole thing I have had to deal with. What I will say, and have siad before is that if I have learned anything it is that I have wasted too much time worrying "How long have I got?" or "Will this be my last Christmas/Birthday" etc. I believe too that we shoud not always strive too much to do things when our bodies are saying to us to rest and go to bed! Believe me I have pushed myself many times and usually end up hurting my back and then ending up in bed for even longer. We are only here once, as we al know and we want to spend our time in different ways. I am not Superwoman but I have compassion. I hope bernie Nolan hightlights Secondary Breast cancer but I wish she sis not have it. I read both primary and secondery BC threads and welcome all people on to our Secondary threads. I am saddened by the fury I feel on some of the posts and do not find that at all helpful. I hope I have not offended anyone. But we all have different views and opinions and it is good to put down in words how we feel especaily as sometimes we do not want to share our innermost thoughts with those closest to us. Val ( Should I should I not press the post button?)

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Well how did that happen my last post came up first?

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Sorry Lulu that took me so long to type that I did not read your post. I have sent you a reply to your PM on FB. Val

Guest user
Not applicable

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

I like realistic!! Well done!!! 

Re: Bernie Nolan diagnosed with secondary cancer

Im a bit like flori.... Im not optomistic about my future being cancer free... However i am not pessimistic either.... I prefer realistic!

going from grade 1 stage 1 to grade 3 stage 1 to grade 3 stage 3b And carrying brca2 its hard to think that secondary BC wont be part of my future.... However going back to the 40% chance of mets, nowadays oncologists seem less likely to say whether they think it will come back and more likely to suggest how long you will survive... eg i have been given somewhere in the region of 80% chance of still being alive in 10 years, but this is with or without cancer.

with primary cancer most onologists are treating you curatively... They hope to cure you (and if yours isnt get a new onc), but as h others have said whether this is actually the case they cannot predict.... Maybe one day they will hav the technology to determine this... But for women with primaries most will go on to live a healthy life where cancer does not play a part. I think for those who wih to refer to themselves as cured if it works for you then go for it.... After all at that point in time you are cured.

i frequent the secondaries sections of the forum as i like to have all the information available to me and find the support and close knit caring and sharing a valuable part of my bcc experience.

As for he medias portrayal of news... They pretty much sensationalise everything.... Even the BBC.... Although they might insert words like 'can' or 'may' unlike the Sun saying it will. It doesnt seem to matter much wither its about secondary breast cancer, obesity, elections or war and strife.

Hopefully though with pressure and recent scrutiny the media and press will tighten up their belts.

Sending love, best wishes and group hugs to all
lulu xxxx