I guess I was "lucky" as the lobular cancer was my second breast cancer in the same breast, so I had an MRI of the other breast without asking, to check if I needed a double mastectomy - as I'd already had lumpectomy and radiotherapy another lumpectomy wasn't an option. (First time round was an IDC)
On the other hand, it did take a bit of pushing to get diagnosed in the first place - I noticed a thick area last March but nothing showed on the routine mammo so I was happy enough. Then I realised it was niggling at my mind - with my history, my GP was OK to refer me at once, and although still nothing turned up on the mammo or ultrasound, and I was being told it was just scarring from the lumpectomy, the surgeon ordered 3 core biopsies and the rest is history.
What concerns me is the emphasis on "finding a lump" - I know it's only around 10% of cases are lobular, but a thick area just wasn't on my screen as a sign to get checked right away.
Not sure about the need for another category, though - once past diagnosis, the treatment isn't all that different, so which area do you look in for info about chemo, arimidex etc? If anything needs its own category, it might be inflammatory, which does have a very different profile.
I find having "After treatment has finished" and "living with breast cancer" confusing already. And perhaps the new site will have an even better search facility? I used that to find out as much as possible about lobular (and the US site!)
Lyn
... View more