It’s interesting how there are different words used. When I was first dx June 2016, they approached the treatment plan with “curative intent”. Nobody from my medical team ever jumped up and down and said “yippee you’re cured” (now that would be a sight 😂 ) at the end, but I go on evidence and statistics. Everybody’s cancer diagnosis and pathology results are different. No surprise there, as we are all different! My cancer was detected early (self examination) at Stage 1, aggressive at Grade 3 and triple negative so non hormone receptive. I had a complete pathological response to the chemo, and opted for a mastectomy after. They biopsied the removed breast and deemed it as a complete pathological response from this. Statistically my chance of reoccurrence stands at 2%. This is what my team calculate based on their calculations and research concurs with that figure too. My consultant has told me that after the 5 year mark, with my type of cancer, another diagnosis of cancer is classed as a new cancer and not a reoccurrence of the old one. After this period I would compare myself as the same as anybody else, unless I give myself reason not to like I start smoking, drinking excessively etc., which I certainly do not plan on doing! So for me, I think it can be a very individual decision of what to label it. I quench the anxiety of reoccurrence with the stats, but I also appreciate life more, celebrate the small wins with the big ones, squeeze my kids tighter and exercise more and make better food choices. The word remission scares me. I don’t use it because I don’t like it, not because I disagree with it. I don’t use “cured” either as I’m not comfortable with that either (I’m sounding indecisive here). I say “I got the all clear in...” Covers a multitude of things for me. wishing you all continued health and happiness xx
... View more