Hi @delly I can only speak from my experience in all this so far .. My cancer, after biopsy was graded 2. After surgery it was re-graded to a 3. It was 3cms and I had calcifications that took total area of removal to 7cms. When I saw my oncologist initially he thought that due to grading it would be likely that chemo would be recommended. However, he suggested that my tumour was sent to the US to be Oncotype tested. The scoring of this would give a clearer picture. It tests for % likelihood of reoccurrence and also whether or not your particular cancer is likely to respond to chemo. My score came back at 18 which is in the intermediate range (16 - 25). The oncologist was happy with my score and said no chemo required in his opinion. I did some reading up and found the Tailor study. This reported that patients under the age of 50 with an intermediate score may still benefit from having chemo. This put my head into a bit of a spin! Hence I sought a second opinion. Oncologist No2 said that although my risk of reoccurrence was already low, chemo would potentially lower it some more. My lymph nodes were clear but I was still left feeling very anxious. The ‘what if’ played very heavily on my mind. No-one is able to guarantee that any rouge cells haven’t pinged of around your body unfortunately. Possibly in your blood. Chemo was still being offered to me and on this basis, I made the personal decision to have it. It is a very personal choice and I know many others would have been able to close the box as it were and move on. I didn’t feel mentally able to do that. I had said, from diagnosis that I would take whatever was offered to me in order to minimise my future risk as much as possible. When it comes to cancer, nothing unfortunately is guaranteed but I want to come out the other side knowing I’ve thrown everything at it. I hope this helps in answering your questions. Sending my love to you. Sarah xxx
... View more