Hi everyone
I was just wondering if anyone has had a similar experience to me because im finding it very difficult to decide what to do. I had 17mm grade 3 cancer with one lymph node affected. At my first oncology appointment I was told that the standard treatment would be chemotherapy and that my predict score showed a 6% benefit to having chemo. However, I was also told I could take part in the Optima trial, which uses a test called prosigna to analyse the tumour and see how much benefit I would get from chemotherapy. If the test shows a low benefit I would then not be able to chose to have chemo, but would go straight to having hormone therapy.
What Im finding difficult is that if I go into the trial and it comes up that I dont need chemo I know Ill worry about it, (a lot!) . While i know they wouldnt recommend somethig they thought was safe and beneficial, I would find it difficult not to worry and think that maybe it would have been safer to go for the chemo. I have 3 teenage children and want to give myself the best chance possible of making a full recovery. However, chemo seems a lot to go through when you have been told that there is a possibility that you may not need it. I think I might feel a bit of a fraud having it if I choose not to be in the trial. Also I would feel guilty abot putting my family through seeing me go through chemo when i was thinking it might not be necessary.
Im leaning towards going straight for the chemo but finding it difficult to know if this is the right thing, particularly when the oncologist seemed very keen for me to do the trial.
If anyone has had a similar dilema it would be lovely to hear from you.