Hi murphy . Hope you pick up soon . After speaking to the onco on Friday he said that the percentage gain from another 2 chemo was v small and I had made things better for myself by having the 4 . Obviously 2 more would give a tiny bit more benefit but as you know by now they just don’t know ! Some research has been done in the u.s that showed for people with no lymph node involvement survival rates were no higher from 6 sessions than 4 . If I had carried on the fec I may have got to 6 more easily but maybe the tax evil as it is has done a better job of killing any cells than the 2 fec would have ? Who bloody knows ? If they could test us halfway thru and say yes we have zapped it all or no we haven’t then it would be so easy to decide wouldn’t it ? The main thing for me is that I was borderline for chemo and the onco was sucking his teeth long and hard looking at my onco type dx test . I knew that he did not know what to say to me about the need for chemo , and I could have walked away from it. . I chose not to and having 4 chemo will have helped to knock a few more percent off risk . I still have rads and tamoxifen to get through.i don’t want to end up so ill from chemo that I can’t get on with life again , I don’t even eat healthily at the moment as a result of it . I’m also mentally stressed and need some phsyc support . Anyway will see what onco has up his sleeve next week to tempt me with !
Ps
I do hope I haven’t scared anyone with my tax tales as not everyone gets the same effects .